[Orechem] Example CrystalEye feed

[Peter Murray-Rust]

I'm only just back from Australia and haven't completely caught up with Jim.
FWIW the normal way we express ontologies is RDF/XML but I will explore the
issues with Jim.

We had a very good session on Linked Open Data at eResearch - about 50
people came and we let the discussion take its own course. There were a
number of people interested in RDF and the OREChem approach but in practice
the major issues were all about Open Data and who owned what and released
what/when/to_whom, etc.

On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Carl Lagoze <clagoze at gmail.com> wrote:

> I don't think we anticipated this situation :-( personally, I always think
> that it's a bad idea to maintain a hard copy of something that is computable
> because of the danger of them getting out of phase. But, I understand your
> motivation here. Perhaps the use of the link/related facility in atom would
> make sense here. One could argue that the RDF XML representation is just a
> mirror copy of this representation of the aggregation, albeit in another
> format.
>  On Nov 22, 2009, at 11:19 AM, Jim Downing wrote:
>
> > 2009/11/22 Carl Lagoze <clagoze at gmail.com>:
> >> What's the recommended way of getting the RDF representation of an
> >> oreatom:entry? Con-neg or another link at rel='alternate'?
> >>
> >> I'm confused about your question here.  You can translate to the RDF/XML
> >> translation of the feed via the grddl
> >> at http://www.openarchives.org/ore/atom-grddl.xsl.
> >
> > GRDDL's OK, but I'd rather provide access to the RDF for the majority
> > of clients, who don't have either knowledge of OREAtom or an XLST
> > processor.
> >
> > jim
>
>


-- 
Peter Murray-Rust
Reader in Molecular Informatics
Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
University of Cambridge
CB2 1EW, UK
+44-1223-763069
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.openarchives.org/pipermail/orechem/attachments/20091125/b2f3915b/attachment.htm