[OAI-implementers] Sets and stuff, OAI 2.0
Wed, 15 May 2002 11:26:38 +0100
I would add to Xiaoming's list "identifier", both as a URL from which the
resource can be obtained, and, if the resource is a published article, the
location of the published version.
I would strongly suggest using the "Family-name, Forenames" format for
creator and "yyyy-mm-dd" style dates (rather than "september 2000").
(n.b. "abstract" should go into DC "description")
----- Original Message -----
From: "Xiaoming Liu" <email@example.com>
To: "deridder" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 3:05 AM
Subject: Re: [OAI-implementers] Sets and stuff, OAI 2.0
> On Tue, 14 May 2002, deridder wrote:
> > (Oh, and if you can recommend which ListRecord fields you have found
> > useful, I'd like to hear about that also; I'd like to standardize my
> > returns.)
> For DC metadata, I think some fields like "title","creator", "subject" and
> "abstract" are widely used for building advanced search interface in
> resource discovery.
> The other fields like "rights" may not be widely used in search interface,
> but they can be shown in search result page whenever the resource is
> For community or archive specific metadata, it will be difficult for a
> general service provider to exploit the semantics, but I think the
> "branding" introduced in 2.0 brings a new way for service provider to
> present the information even if it doesn't understand the meanings.
> My personal view is the more information, the better.
> OAI-implementers mailing list