[Ore-acceleration] 7 Easy Pieces -- Test Complex Objects

[Michael Nelson]

[test cases now on the blog as per H's request]

On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Rob Sanderson wrote:

> I don't think that any of the below have ordered parts?
> Or is that what you mean by differing granularities in the CiteSeer
> example?

I would argue that in the arXiv example, version 1 should be ordered
before version 2.  Maybe even the photos in the album; assuming they're
uploaded in particular order, the user probably doesn't want them
randomized.  I think that should cover ordering.

In order to increase the likelihood of adoption, I think we should stick
to "real-world" examples, and even with the exception of the single arXiv
eprint, examples that we don't "control".  That way we can't be accused of
creating hand-crafting examples or promoting a framework based on the
latent model of our own repositories.

regards,

Michael

>
> For what it's worth, my mental example, for which I don't have a
> concrete example, is:
>
> An overlay text book with:
> 	* 10 chapters
> 	  * First chapter is new introduction
>  	  * Chapters 2-4 are in section 1
> 	  * 5-7 are in section 2
> 	  * 8-10 are in section 3
> 	* 2 Appendices (ordered)
> 	* 3 datasets (not ordered)
> 	* 1 application [for processing datasets]
> 	* Citations at book level (bibliography)
> 	  And at chapter level (extra reading lists)
>
> And then add in as many different representations as you want for the
> chapters.
>
> Rob
>
>

----
Michael L. Nelson mln at cs.odu.edu http://www.cs.odu.edu/~mln/
Dept of Computer Science, Old Dominion University, Norfolk VA 23529
+1 757 683 6393 +1 757 683 4900 (f)