[Orechem] Document ontology and instance prototypes

[Carl Lagoze]

Ah yes, forgot to mention that.  You will note a triple in the main  
document aggregation:

		<orechem:referencesExperiment>
			<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://examples.net/Experiments/E1">
				<rdf:type>
					<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://orechem.org/ontologies/document/experiment 
"/>
				</rdf:type>
			</rdf:Description>
		</orechem:referencesExperiment>

This is intended to link to instances expressed in the experiment  
ontology put up by Mark.
On Jul 28, 2009, at 4:35 PM, Frey J.G. wrote:

> Is this consistent with the Experiment Ontology put up by Mark?
> Jeremy
>
>
>
> On 28/07/2009 19:38, "Carl Lagoze" <clagoze at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all:
>
> I just put up on the wiki at http://services.nsdl.org/trac/oreChem/wiki/DocumentOntology 
>  the results of a good bit of work I've done on a proposed document  
> ontology for the project.  The text below is the guts of the wiki  
> entry.  I realize the work is not yet complete, but I think it gives  
> a reasonable working model of what the PSU folks should use to  
> represent info extracted from documents (I used the spec sent by Lee  
> GIles as my requirements document).  As I say in the wiki text, the  
> model is ORE compatible, which I consider quite important.
>
> I'd work more on this but am leaving for vacation on Thursday  
> through August 16 (no email contact) and wanted to get this out.   
> Flame at will but I won't respond till return.
>
> Now onto my N other deadlines before leaving.
>
> Carl
>
>
>
> PPrototype document ontology and instance <http://services.nsdl.org/trac/oreChem/wiki/DocumentOntology#Prototypedocumentontologyandinstance 
> >
> I've attached to this wiki page three files that show my proposal  
> thus far:
>
> *   orechem.owl (probobly should be rdfs) - This is a set of  
> vocabulary terms that I had to invent for the ontology. Virtually  
> all are specializations (subclasses or subproperties) of terms from  
> other vocabularies.
> *   orechem-article.xml - An rdf instance file illustrating a rather  
> complete example of the use of orechem.owl and lots of other  
> vocabularies. I models an article in a journal. To do that it uses  
> vocabulary terms from lots of namespaces including:
>    *   Dublin Core elements and terms
>    *   foaf
>    *   ore
>    *   chemaxiom
>    *   bibo
>    *   vcard
> *   orechem-article.svg - A graphical display (From ISAVIZ) of  
> orechem-article.xml. Lots of triples here so you'll have to zoom in.
>
> You will note that the example is compatible with the ORE notion of  
> an Aggregation (and describing Resource Map), modulo a few missing  
> metadata elements. This was obviously a priority for me since we  
> want to fit into this generic space.
>
> Also, probably much to Nico's chagrin, this is all an RDF-based  
> rather than OWL-based model. Sorry, but too much of the world (e.g.,  
> DC, ORE, bibo) does not fit in the OWL space, but in the more  
> generic RDF space. We do loose inferencing ability, but personally I  
> don't see that as important until triple stores scale-up to that task.
>
>
>