[Orechem] Various reminders
Nico Adams
na303 at cam.ac.uk
Thu Jul 2 05:40:06 EDT 2009
Dear All,
much as I would like to remain involved, meeting-wise I obviously cannot
commit to anything right now. All the best for the meeting though. I'll be
on the telco on the 13th.
All the best,
Nico
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Carl Lagoze <clagoze at gmail.com> wrote:
> Lee,
>
> Thanks for getting back to me on this. We will miss you on the 13th but
> will press on without you. Regarding the meeting date I fully agree that the
> October 15 date makes sense (easy for me to say since Pittsburgh is so easy
> for me to get to) but I want to hear from the rest of the crowd.
>
> On Jul 1, 2009, at 1:49 PM, Lee Dirks wrote:
>
> A couple of quick comments...
>>
>> Re #2 - I won't be able to make the call on the 13th. Just FYI.
>>
>> Re #3 - Until we lock on a specific official date/location for the 3rd Q
>> meeting, I'd still like us to please try and hold the date of Thursday,
>> October 15th for a meeting at CMU in Pittsburgh. The eScience Workshop
>> doesn't start until the evening on the 15th -- so if we arrived on the 14th,
>> we could have a day-long meeting on the 15th and move straight into the
>> planned eScience welcome event that evening.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -jld
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: orechem-bounces at openarchives.org [mailto:
>> orechem-bounces at openarchives.org] On Behalf Of Carl Lagoze
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 10:03 AM
>> To: orechem at openarchives.org
>> Subject: [Orechem] Various reminders
>>
>> Hi everyone;
>>
>> I wanted to remind you of a few things that we have all committed to
>> or need to pay attention to.
>>
>> 1. The various teams have committed to putting up a scope statement
>> for their respective ontologies by July 6. That is this coming Monday
>> and I strongly urge you to follow through on your commitment to that
>> date.
>>
>> 2. We had also agreed to a phone call at noon Eastern time on Monday,
>> July 13 to review the ontology scope statements and move onto the next
>> step. At this point I received replies from only four people (Simon
>> Coles, Alex Wade, Karl Mueller, and Jim Downing) that they can make
>> that call. Is it then true that no other project members can make that
>> call? Or have you just forgotten to verify your attendance on the
>> doodle page at http://doodle.com/2zwwhksqr6vxpfef? In any case, please
>> see if you can make that call so we can move our work forward.
>>
>> 3. We had some discussions at our Penn State meeting about the next
>> face-to-face meeting sometime in the third quarter of 2009. We had
>> also chatted about doing this in the UK. However, since then, as I
>> assume you have seen, the announcement came out for the next Microsoft
>> eScience conference at Carnegie Mellon on October 15 through October
>> 17. Much as I would like to make life easier for our UK colleagues, it
>> seems foolish to not tack a meeting on to this already existing
>> meeting. Please let me know what you feel about this.
>>
>> 4. Finally, the submission deadline for the eScience conference is
>> July 30. I would like to add to the agenda on our July 13 call a
>> discussion of what we plan to submit to this conference. I think it is
>> very important that we have some demonstrable and reportable progress
>> by that point.
>>
>> Carl
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Orechem mailing list
>> Orechem at openarchives.org
>> http://www.openarchives.org/mailman/listinfo/orechem
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Orechem mailing list
>> Orechem at openarchives.org
>> http://www.openarchives.org/mailman/listinfo/orechem
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Orechem mailing list
> Orechem at openarchives.org
> http://www.openarchives.org/mailman/listinfo/orechem
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.openarchives.org/pipermail/orechem/attachments/20090702/5b4e7208/attachment.htm
More information about the Orechem
mailing list