[OAI-implementers] sets - metadataPrefix relationship

[Gary McGath]

Irina Dijour wrote:

> 
> I have a question concerning sets - metadataPrefix relationship.
> 
> Is it permitted by the protocol to "attach" metadataPrefix to set?
> 
>  
> 
> For example, is the following situation is valid:
> 
> I define two sets  A and B. All the records from my repository belong to
> both sets.
> 
> Set A "contains" records in marcxml. Set B "contains" records in oai_dc.
> 
> ListSets response contains 2 sets: A and B
> 
> ListMetadataFormats reponse contains 2 formats: marxml and oai_dc.
> 
> ListRecords request with set=A, metadataPrefix=marcxml - results in list
> of records
> 
> ListRecords request with set=A, metadataPrefix=oai_dc - results in error
> cannotDissemenateFormat
> 
> ListRecords request with set=B, metadataPrefix=marcxml - results in
> error cannotDissemenateFormat
> 
> ListRecords request with set=B, metadataPrefix=oai_dc - results in list
> of record
> 
> GetRecord request for any record in my repository both with
> metadataPrefix=marcxml and with
> 
> metadataPrefix=oai_dc results in the record in corresponding format.

My understanding is that you can have one set that delivers only oai_dc 
records, and another that delivers only marcxml records; but in the 
cases you give the appropriate error response would be noRecordsMatch 
rather than cannotDisseminateFormat.

Imagine a case where a set contained only one record that could be 
returned as marcxml.  If your date range included that record, then 
you'd return the record; if not, you'd return noRecordsMatch.  The same 
logic applies if there are no records in the set that can be returned as 
marcxml.

-- 
Gary McGath
Digital Library Software Engineer
Harvard University Library Office for Information Systems
http://hul.harvard.edu/~gary/index.html