[OAI-implementers] OAI 2.0 versus 1.0/1.1 handling
Wed, 19 Jun 2002 15:50:07 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, Alan Kent wrote:
> I am tossing up in my mind whether its worth the effort of continuing
> to support 1.0 and 1.1 by copying down required namespace declarations
> from above etc. I can do it, its just messy. How important do people
> think continued support for 1.0/1.1 is I wonder? How long before everyone
I guess one way is to use the Celestial (oaia) implemented by Tim Brody.
It harvests 1.x data providers, caches the data, and exposes them in
So 2.0 applications can use Celestial to harvest 1.x compliant data
> Opinions welcome!
> Alan Kent (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org, http://www.mds.rmit.edu.au/~ajk/)
> Project: TeraText Technical Director, InQuirion Pty Ltd (www.inquirion.com)
> Postal: Multimedia Database Systems, RMIT, GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne 3001.
> Where: RMIT MDS, Bld 91, Level 3, 110 Victoria St, Carlton 3053, VIC Australia.
> Phone: +61 3 9925 4114 Reception: +61 3 9925 4099 Fax: +61 3 9925 4098
> OAI-implementers mailing list