[OAI-general] Technical report on Open Source Repositories
Richard.Wyles at openpolytechnic.ac.nz
Tue Sep 26 17:04:27 EDT 2006
There has never been any intent to justify by misleading. Our motivations have been to determine the right solution for our specific project. Inherently, in these types of reports, there will be a measure of subjective observations. We will re-visit the points you raise and amend the narrative as appropriate. Please note that this report does have a Creative Commons Share Alike License if you also wish to add to, amend or reuse parts.
From: Jean-Yves Le Meur [mailto:jeanyves at mail.cern.ch]
Sent: Wednesday, 27 September 2006 12:03 a.m.
To: Wyles, Richard
Cc: openarchives at openarchives.org; oai-general at openarchives.org
Subject: Re: [OAI-general] Technical report on Open Source Repositories
In this report is stated:
CDSware (now recently changed to CDS Invenio) has been excluded from
the in-depth analysis for the following reasons
It has extremely complex installation steps. These steps can be seen here:
CDSware also does not have a good community around it. The mailing
list has had very limited traffic since 2002, which indicates that this
project may have sustainability issues going forward:
These two statements about CDS Invenio are not correct.
Understanding that the authors may have wanted to narrow the field of
study to make the task easier, they should not have justified this using
false statements which would misguide the community.
About the first point, the "complex installation" instructions:
they are mostly full and explicit details for the curious or novice
sysadmin. The impatient installer is simply directed to 20 lines of
instructions in the middle.
About the second point, the community around Invenio: the adopter
community is growing, as is the developer community which is now wider
that just the CERN site with formal collaboration established with EPFL
and many other contributions world-wide. The developper listbox is very
active but the authors of the report did not subscribe to it... The
authors of the report also missed the 'Demo' link where quite a few sites
using Invenio are linked to; among them are the biggest OAI data provider
in terms of number of documents...
It is a pity to write such a report without taking into account
one of the biggest and most used Open Source Repository software. At
least, the exclusion of CDS Invenio from the study should not be justified
by misleading arguments.
Jean-Yves Le Meur.
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Wyles, Richard wrote:
> We have just finished a report on open source OMI-PMH compliant systems.
> The project is at https://eduforge.org/projects/oarinz/
> It is early in the project but if you would like to know anything further please let me know.
> Richard Wyles
> Tel: 64 4 913 5987
> Mailto:richard.wyles at openpolytechnic.ac.nz
> Skype: richardwyles
> e-Learning Network <https://eduforge.org/projects/ecampus/>
> Open Education Resources project <https://eduforge.org/projects/oer/>
> Open Access Repositories in New Zealand <http://www.oarinz.ac.nz/>
> NZ e-Portfolio project <https://eduforge.org/projects/nzeportfolio/>
> Eduforge <http://www.eduforge.org/>
> OAI-general mailing list
> List information, archives, preferences and to unsubscribe:
More information about the OAI-general